HC asks UP police to file FIR with petitioner's version of 'fake encounter'

Passing the order, the court directed that a copy of the FIR be placed before it on September 29, the next date of hearing in the matter

Police deployment
According to the petitioner, she had approached the SSP, Jhansi with an application on October 11, 2019 but an FIR was not registered.
Press Trust of India Prayagraj (UP)
2 min read Last Updated : Sep 15 2022 | 8:29 AM IST

The Allahabad High Court has directed the senior superintendent of police (SSP), Jhansi to ensure that the FIR of a petitioner, whose husband was killed in a police encounter in 2019, be lodged with her version that the man was killed in a fake encounter.

The court has directed the SSP and the station house officers (SHOs) of the Gursahay and Moth police stations in Jhansi to ensure that the FIR of petitioner Shivangi Yadav be lodged with her version that her husband was killed in a fake police encounter.

Passing the order, the court directed that a copy of the FIR be placed before it on September 29, the next date of hearing in the matter.

The petitioner had requested the court to order the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to conduct the probe into the killing of her husband, Pushpendra Singh Yadav, on October 5, 2019 in a fake encounter under the Moth police station.

In its order passed on Monday, the bench comprising justices Suneet Kumar and Syed Waiz Mian observed: "Having regard to the detailed order of this court on February 19, 2020, it will be in the interest of justice that the version of the petitioner that her husband was brutally killed in a fake encounter needs to be registered."

According to the petitioner, she had approached the SSP, Jhansi with an application on October 11, 2019 but an FIR was not registered.

The petition alleges that Pushpendra Singh Yadav was killed by police in a fake encounter and his last rites were performed in the absence of his family members to destroy the evidence of the fake encounter and save the officers involved in it.

It has also been alleged by the petitioner that documents related to the encounter and the death of her husband were not given to the family members.

The petitioner has also urged the court to direct the Uttar Pradesh government to refer the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Uttar PradeshAllahabad High Courtfake encounters

First Published: Sep 15 2022 | 8:29 AM IST

Next Story