HC sends notice to Delhi govt on odd-even scheme

Court referred to its previous January 11 order where it had asked govt to consider contentions of a group of lawyers

cars, Delhi, odd even
Traffic moves slowly at second phase of odd-even scheme
Sayan Ghosal New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Sep 13 2019 | 6:13 PM IST
The second phase of the ‘odd-even scheme’ came under the judicial scanner on Tuesday with the Delhi High Court seeking the Delhi government’s response to a batch of petitions filed to quash the April 11 notification restricting the movement of vehicles based on odd- or even-numbered registrations.

The main contention in one of petitions was that Section 115 of the Motor Vehicles Act does not empower the government to restrict the movement of vehicles according to an odd-even classification. In support of their stand, the petitioners highlighted that the ambit of the Section was restricted to the movement of traffic for public safety and convenience, and that it could not be invoked to curb pollution.

Another petition filed by lawyer Rajiv Khosla sought exemption of advocates from the scheme on the plea that they assist courts in protecting civil rights and public liberties of citizens.

The high court referred to its previous order dated January 11 during the first phase of the odd-even scheme, where it had asked the government to consider the contentions of a group of lawyers, as well as other petitioners, before implementing the scheme in future.

“Please get instructions and file a status report on whether you have considered this aspect (exempting the lawyers or not). Tell us with regard to the steps you have taken before issuance of this present notification,” the court said.

The other contentions raised in the present petitions before the high court highlighted the arbitrary fixation of Rs 2,000 fine without proper amendments to the Motor Vehicles Act. Concerns over discrimination of ‘non-driving’ over ‘driving’ women also placed before the court as the scheme only exempts women driving in cases of emergency, but does not cover cases of emergency where women are being driven.

The matter has been listed for further hearing on April 25.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :odd-even scheme

First Published: Apr 20 2016 | 12:33 AM IST

Next Story