The political storm around a controversy involving Jay Amit Shah, son of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) chief Amit Shah, continued on Tuesday, with the Opposition Congress demanding a Supreme Court-monitored probe into the matter. The Congress also gunned for Shah senior's resignation from his party post, even as his son filed a criminal defamation case against news website The Wire in an Ahmedabad court the previous day.
The controversy, which has hit the Narendra Modi-led government and the BJP, had started after the news website reported that a company run by Jay Amit Shah recorded a 16,000-fold increase in its turnover in a year after Modi became the prime minister and his father the BJP president. The report, written by Rohini Singh, detailed the growth of Jay Shah's company, Temple Enterprise Private Ltd, from a revenue of Rs 50,000 in 2014-15 to Rs 80.5 crore in 2015-16.
The controversy seems to have erupted at a politically significant moment, with the Gujarat Assembly election barely 60 days away, and the winter session of Parliament scheduled to start in the first half of November.
Here are the top 10 developments in the case so far:
Additional chief metropolitan magistrate S K Gadhvi ordered a court inquiry on Jay’s complaint under the Criminal Procedure Code section 202 (to inquire into the case to decide whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding). In his application, Jay prayed for "criminal action against the respondents for defaming and tarnishing the reputation of the complainant through an article, which is scandalous, frivolous, misleading, derogatory, libellous and consisting of several defamatory statements". The case has been filed under Indian Penal Code sections 500 (defamation), 109 (abetment), 39 (to voluntarily cause grievous hurt) and 120 B (criminal conspiracy).
10) The report's allegations: The website, The Wire, said its findings were based on filings with the Registrar of Companies (RoC). The report, The Golden Touch of Jay Amit Shah, was published on Sunday morning. The report, which seemed to draw a parallel of the current case with that of the alleged land deals by Congress President Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra during the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, said the revenue of the company owned by Jay jumped from a meagre Rs 50,000 to over Rs 80 crore in a single year. The report also flagged how Jay’s company, whose business is primarily stock trading, turned to generating wind power with a loan from a public sector enterprise. The news website’s report alleged Jay’s company, Temple Enterprises Private Limited, was engaged in negligible activity in financial years ended March 2013 and 2014, recording losses of Rs 6,230 and Rs 1,724, respectively. It alleged the revenues of the company witnessed an “astonishing surge” in the financial year ended March 2015, when the firm received an unsecured loan of Rs 15.78 crore from a financial services firm owned by Rajesh Khandawala, the samdhi (in-law) of Parimal Nathwani, a Rajya Sabha member and top executive of Reliance Industries. It said the revenue of Rs 50,000 increased to over Rs 80 crore in a single year. It said Jay’s company suddenly stopped its business activities in October 2016.