The court observed the Trai could consider deploying them for transmitting telecom signals in the country.The court's observation came in relation to an appeal filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd against an order of the assistant collector of the Virudhunagar district in relation to erection of mobile towers.
The order comes after the court, in March this year, dealt with a similar petition relating to the safety issues associated with erection of mobile phone towers in the vicinity of the human settlements.
The principal bench, comprising of Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice S Manikumar, said, “We may, however, state it is given to understand that there are different technologies now available in some countries, whereby the necessity of erecting towers can be dispensed with either taking underground cables or otherwise.”
“This is a matter for the Trai and the Union government to examine. We thus request the said Authority to look into this aspect and the possibility of the same in India,” said the bench.
The petition was disposed of in the terms of the orders passed by the principal bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice MM Sundresh in March, 2015, on writ petitions under public interest litigation seeking the court to direct the government authorities and various telecom firms to formulate rules, regulations and guidelines to erect mobile phone towers only in vacant lands taking into consideration proper structural standards, WHO’s tower radiation specifications.
Considering the petition, the principal bench observed that none of the petitioners had any conclusive material to show such ill-effects of radiation from the mobile phone towers. The court also took into account observations of the division bench of Kerala high court in a similar matter, which pointed to the findings of a committee under the chairmanship of NK Ganguly, the then director general of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).
The committee was constituted by the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, following the directions of a division bench of Bombay high court in a petition filed in 2004 to conduct a scientific study.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)