The recent notification of bidding guidelines by the government for the award of solar power projects is a positive development for the sector, ICRA said in a statement.
The guidelines address some of the key concerns pertaining to off-taker credit profile, grid curtailment and termination payments, says an ICRA note.
Also Read
In addition, the procurer may also choose to provide state government guarantee in a legally enforceable form, both for payment of energy charges and termination compensation.
"Barring the Rewa Solar Park bid, where there is a guarantee by the Madhya Pradesh state government to cover for payment delays, the payment security approved in the bidding guidelines has not been seen in power purchase agreements (PPAs) signed directly by the state distribution utilities (discoms) under state policy framework.
"This measure, if implemented in PPAs signed directly by state discoms, is favourable for the solar power developers and improves the bankability of the PPA document," said Sabyasachi Majumdar, Senior Vice President & Group Head, ICRA Ratings in the statement.
The guidelines also provide for compensation to solar power generators in case of off-take constraints arising from the delay in commissioning of transmission infrastructure, grid unavailability and grid back-down, which is favourable for solar power generators.
While wind and solar power projects enjoy a "must run" status under the Indian Electricity Grid Code (IEGC) and have to be scheduled before any other source of power, there have been instances in a few states like Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan, where grid curtailment has been observed.
Given the single-part tariff structure for these projects, the project cash flows and hence debt serviceability is directly linked to the actual generation and off-take by the procurers, it added.
Further, it said that a weak termination clause without any mention of the termination liability in the solar PPAs does not provide any risk mitigation to the developers in case it decides to terminate the PPA over a procurer event of default.
In this context, the provisions for termination liability, which, along with substitution rights as approved in bidding guidelines, are expected to provide greater protection to the developers and the lenders.
"It is noteworthy that these regulations shall be applicable only for new projects. The aforementioned concerns would continue to prevail for existing projects", added Majumdar.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
