Ravi Ruia moves SC challenging 2G court order

SC had directed a CBI court to postpone its summons to Bharti Airtel Chairman Sunil Mittal until April 16

Image
Sounak Mitra New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 09 2013 | 7:31 PM IST
Ravi Ruia, vice-chairman of Essar Group, today filed a petition before the Supreme Court (SC) challenging the order of the 2G Special Court summoning him in a case related to alleged irregularities in the allocation of 2G spectrum during the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance regime in 2002.

Ruia’s move comes a day after the SC, on Monday, has directed a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) special court to postpone its summons to Bharti Airtel Chairman Sunil Mittal until April 16.

According to sources, Ruia mentioned in his petition that the only basis for summoning Ruia was that since he had chaired some of the meetings of Sterling Cellular Ltd, he was thus the ‘alter-ego’ and ‘directing mind of the will’ of the Company i.e. Sterling Cellular Ltd.

Ruia held no executive position in Sterling Cellular Ltd and the Essar Group was only a minority shareholder of Sterling Cellular Ltd, it added.

Such a basis where any Director is held liable for the acts of the company is contrary to the well-established legal position.

The petition also added that Ruia has not been named in the Chargesheet and neither was he ever investigated in regard with this matter. If the true and corrects facts pertaining to the affairs of Sterling Cellular Ltd were before the CBI/Court such an order summoning Ruia may not have been passed, it further added.

Ruia declined comments on the issue.

Ruia was summoned by the court on April 11 as an accused along with Sunil Mittal, chairman of Bharti Airtel, Asim Ghosh, the former head of Vodafone-Essar; and former telecom secretary Shyamal Ghosh.

On March 19, the CBI Special Court took cognizance of the CBI chargesheet, and judge O P Saini in his order said that Mittal, Ruia and Ghosh were the “alter ego” of their respective companies.

“The acts of the companies are to be attributed and imputed to them. I find enough material on record to proceed against them also.” Saini also said that they represented “the directing mind and will of each company” and their state of mind was the state of mind of the companies.
Mittal moved the Supreme Court on April 1 for quashing the order against him.

Meanwhile, Citing its failure to find any private individual in the criminal conspiracy, the CBI had in its chargesheet of December 21, 2012, only named Shyamal Ghosh, the then telecom secretary, and three private companies including Bharti Cellular (now Bharti Airtel), Hutchison Max (now Vodafone), and Sterling Cellular (now Vodafone) as accused.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 09 2013 | 7:21 PM IST

Next Story