SC on Jayalalithaa case: 'Special public prosecutor appointment bad'

Says Tamil Nadu has no authority to appoint Bhawani Singh as Special Public Prosecutor

Image
Press Trust Of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 27 2015 | 11:26 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Supreme Court today held that Tamil Nadu government has no right to appoint advocate Bhawani Singh as special public prosecutor(SPP) to appear in Karnataka High Court for J Jayalalithaa's disproportionate assets case.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra, however said, though the appointment of the SPP is "bad in law, it does not warrant "de novo" (fresh) hearing of appeals of the convicts, including the AIADMK chief.

"Tamil Nadu has no authority to appoint respondent number 4 (Singh) as Special Public Prosecutor," the bench also comprising justices R K Agrawal and Prafulla C Pant said, adding that it does not concur with the findings of Justice Madan B Lokur that fresh hearing on the appeal be conducted before the high court.

The bench also allowed DMK leader K Anbazhagan and Karnataka to file written submissions in the high court by tomorrow.

It said that high court can go ahead and pronounce the verdict after considering the submissions of Anbazhagan and the state in the matter.

Dealing with the legal provisions on the appointment of SPP, the bench said Singh's appointment was only meant for the trial in lower court.

On April 22, the apex court had reserved its judgement on the issue of legality of appointment of Singh as SPP and noted that his appointment prima facie appeared to suffer from irregularities but it will not allow the de novo hearing before the high court.

The bench had also allowed the DMK leader, who had filed a petition seeking removal of Singh as SPP in the case, to file his written submission before the high court which will be considered by it before passing its judgement on the appeal by Jayalalithaa and others.

The matter was referred to the larger bench on April 15 when a bench comprising justices Madan B Lokur and R Banumathi had delivered a split verdict.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 27 2015 | 8:40 PM IST

Next Story