SC orders status quo on HC order asking Uber India to comply with MVA norms

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Uber, submitted that it has serious objections to the validity of the Guidelines

SUPREME COURT
Supreme Court of India
Press Trust of India New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Apr 21 2022 | 7:55 PM IST
The Supreme Court Thursday ordered status quo on the Bombay High Court order directing Uber India to comply with Motor Vehicle Aggregator (MVA) Guidelines issued by the Centre.

A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and B R Gavai issued notice to the Centre, Ministry of Road Transport, and others on an appeal filed by Uber India Services Private Ltd against the High Court's order.

Notice and status quo... You serve on the other side, we will list it after two or three weeks, the bench said.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Uber, submitted that it has serious objections to the validity of the Guidelines.

The top court was hearing an appeal filed by Taxi aggregator Uber India against the March 7, 2022 order of the high court directing cab aggregators to comply with MVA Guidelines 2020.

Observing that app-based taxi firms such as Ola and Uber operating in Maharashtra without valid licenses were an instance of "complete lawlessness," the High Court had directed all such aggregators to apply for valid licenses by March 16 if they wish to continue operations.

The HC had refrained from prohibiting such cabs from plying in the meanwhile saying it was aware such a move would adversely affect commuters.

The high court had passed the directions while hearing public interest litigation filed by advocate Savina Crasto highlighting the lack of an effective grievance redressal mechanism for customers using the Uber India app.

Crasto had cited an incident from November 2020, when she booked an Uber ride in the city and was dropped off mid-way at a shady dark place" and she found that the firm's app had no effective option to lodge complaints.

Though the Central government had issued the Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines, meant to regulate such cabs, those in the state were operating based on permits issued to them under Maharashtra City Taxi Rules 2017.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtUber India

First Published: Apr 21 2022 | 7:55 PM IST

Next Story