“A land, a house property and illegally extracted minerals can be auctioned, but not a mineral property. Reserves available in a mineral deposit is subject to fluctuation with developments in technology. We think, no developed or developing country has resorted to this practice. Our view is that the proposed auction route will not be in the interest of mineral development,” SGAT said in its views submitted to the Union mines ministry.
SGAT has argued that auctioning of mining leases would prevent persons having special knowledge and experience to participate in the bidding process. It said, this practice would result in cartelisation and the successful bidder may not be obliged to supply ore/mineral to domestic industries and for export. The successful bidder will most certainly resort to selective mining, thereby rendering the mineral property unsuitable for scientific mining, the body opined. According to SGAT, the proposal of disposal of mineral bearing areas for development through auction is likely to make the provisions of reconnaissance permit (RP) & prospecting licence redundant.
SGAT has also opposed to the proposal for classifying minerals as ‘notified’ and ‘non-notified’. It has further held the maximum areas prescribed for prospecting licenses (PL) and mining lease (ML) are quite large. These may be limited to 100 sq km for PL and 50 sq km for ML.
Ruling out the need to constitute special courts, SGAT said, the existing judicial system can well be strengthened for speedy trial of offences relating to illegal mining.
It has pitched for participation of private players in mineral exploration.
“We would like to emphasize the fact that government agencies alone cannot carry out detailed exploration for proving mineral deposits. The private sector has to step-in in a big way. This is also the approach of National Mineral Policy, 2008”, SGAT stated.
SGAT has also called for streamlining forest and environment laws and expediting procedures for granting clearances. The laws relating to forest & environment clearances can be merged into a single umbrella law as recommended by TSR Subramaniam committee to facilitate and expedite clearances.
Additionally, SGAT has suggested that the statutory requirement of obtaining prior approval of central government for grant of renewal of mining leases for scheduled minerals may be dispensed with and the state governments be authorised to grant first and subsequent renewals of MLs if the state governments are satisfied that it is necessary to do so in the interest of mineral development.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
