Supreme Court refers Delhi govt vs Centre issue to a larger bench

Two-judge bench split on verdict, but agree L-G will have control over the ACB as notified by Centre

Supreme Court
A general view of the Supreme Court after the Ayodhya hearing was rescheduled to January 29. Photo: Aashish Aryan
Aashish AryanPTI New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 14 2019 | 9:05 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Thursday referred to a larger bench the issue of whether the Delhi government or the central government would control the administrative services officers appointed to the state-capital. The two judges, however, gave a unanimous verdict that the Lieutenant Governor (L-G) of Delhi, appointed by the President, would have absolute control over the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB).

A two-judge bench of Justice A K Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan in their judgement also agreed that the power to appoint inquiry commissions would rest with the Centre. The Delhi government, on the other hand, would have the right to appoint public prosecutors, decide land revenue matters and appoint or deal with electricity commission or board, the bench said.

The most contentious issue of who would have the right to appoint or transfer officers of the administrative services divided the judges. While Justice Bhushan said that Delhi government should have no power at all over administrative services, Justice Sikri was of the view that the transfer or posting of officers from joint secretary rank or above should be done only by the central government. For officers of Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Civil Service (DANICS) and Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands Police Service (DANIPS), the file should be sent to the L-G by the state government’s council of ministers.

In case, there is a dispute between the two, the view of the L-G should prevail, Justice Sikri said.

Terming the judgement "injustice to the people" of Delhi as well as “against constitution and democracy”, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said that his government would seek legal remedies against the verdict. The Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) Delhi president Manoj Tiwari on the other hand welcomed the top court's judgment and said was a lesson for "urban naxals" like Kejriwal.

“This verdict is a slap on the face of urban naxals like Arvind Kejriwal. Why, after all, he wants to go across the boundaries of the Constitution. He should now focus on work after this judgment,” Tiwari said.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story