FM blames lack of competition for power woes

Jaitley said the consumer has no option when it comes to the electricity provider - which has happened due to no competition

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley addressing the officer trainees of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs & C Excise) of the 67th batch in New Delhi on Saturday. PTI Photo by Vijay Verma
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley addressing the officer trainees of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs & C Excise) of the 67th batch in New Delhi on Saturday. PTI Photo by Vijay Verma
Deepak Patel New Delhi
Last Updated : May 21 2016 | 12:44 AM IST
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said on Friday blamed the mess in the power sector on the lack of reforms in the state. Delivering the annual lecture of Competition Commission of India (CCI) here, Jaitley said the consumer has no option when it comes to the electricity provider - which has happened due to no competition.

"Not creating competition has led to this aberration the power sector. Today, we have a situation where we have more power than we need. We have a distribution network which is spread throughout the country. But, when it reaches the consumer, they have no option. This is the sector reform which is yet to take place," he said.

CCI Chairman D K Sikri also acknowledged that the body is facing a variety of challenges, including procedural and jurisdictional issues, he said the endeavour is to base its decisions on "sound economics" at the event.

He added that while The Electricity Act, 2003 - the central Act which envisages that the customer must have number of electricity providers to choose from - its implementation lies with the states. "2003 Act was a central law but power sector - particularly distribution, which is the real challenge of the sector - is entirely with the states. And the old mindset still continues to exist in a number of states or in most of them as they are unwilling to let go of the state distribution companies," he said.

Jaitley said that being pro-business without being pro-competition can create a dangerous situation like Russia - where the corporate sector is dominated by oligarchs.

"Being pro-business alone is not enough. Being pro-competition is essential to be pro-business. If you are pro-business without being pro-competition, the consequences can be very dangerous," he said. '

"Take the example of Russia, they went in for a lot of privatization, but because there was no competition, the entire privatization led to the creation of oligarchs. And oligarchs again meant monopoly," he added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 21 2016 | 12:22 AM IST

Next Story