CAG raises issue of viability of NPS schemes for govt employees

Without such evaluation, there is no guarantee of viability of these schemes, CAG said in its report on the NPS, presented to Parliament on Wednesday

Govt recovered less than 9% service tax arrears in FY17: CAG
CAG said the high-level expert group (HLEC) had recommended way back in 2002 to have an actuarial evaluation of the funds, once in two years
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Sep 24 2020 | 11:56 PM IST
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) flag­ged the lack of evaluation of funds and schemes under the Nati­onal Pension System (NPS) for government empl­oyees. Without such evaluation, there is no guarantee of viability of these schemes, CAG said in its report on NPS presented to Parliament on Wednesday.

CAG said the high level ex­pert group (HLEC) had recommended in 2002 that there sh­o­uld be an actuarial evaluation of the funds once in two years as the government might like to rationalise the benefit structure or increase the contribution rate as the case might be. 

“From the documents, responses made available to audit, it was observed that there was no indication whe­ther the HLEG recommendations were accepted or not,” it said. When asked about this, the Department of Financial Services (DFS) replied that the HLEG was set up by the Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare (DoPPW) and the information about the recommendation was not traceable in DFS records. 

However, DFS did not provide a specific reply with regard to actuarial evaluation once in two years and adoption of any other mechanism to assess the viability of the fund or scheme. 

“Thus, the audit could not draw assurance on viability of the fund/scheme. This assu­mes importance in view of the fact that the actuarial evaluation is at the core of any pension scheme,” CAG said. It said total assets under management (AUM) amo­unted to Rs 3.99 trillion as of January 31, with Rs 3.41 trillion pertaining to the government sector — both the Centre and states. DFS in its reply also stated that a review of NPS’s performance vis-à-vis the exp­ected outcomes and standards envisaged at inception, and the way forward is under consideration. DFS said it intended to conduct actuarial evaluation to assess the situation.


One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :cagComptroller and Auditor General CAGNational Pension System

Next Story