Mismatch in coal mine output data flagged

Of the production figures submitted to the Coal Controller's Organisation by 19 prior allottees in West Bengal, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra, there were mismatches in eight

CAG sees mismatch in coal mine output data
Megha Manchanda New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 27 2016 | 1:12 AM IST
The Comptroller and Auditor General said on Tuesday there were discrepancies in production data furnished by prior coal block allottees and the monitoring mechanism was inadequate.

The CAG observed the mechanism at the Coal Controller’s Organisation (CCO) was weak, especially in the scenario after e-auctions of coal mines. Officials, however, said monitoring is the domain of the state governments and efforts had been made to improve it.

Under a monitoring mechanism prescribed by the Centre, coal block allotees are required to file report before commencement of production and after with CCO. Besides, revenue collection is done based on evaluation by the state mining and excise departments. About Rs 2,200 crore has flowed to the state governments from 13 coal blocks that have started production. The e-auction mechanism has multiple conditions for extraction and use of coal by successful bidders. The conditions ensure coal is extracted to plan and used for the purpose the mine was allocated, and to protect the interest of the exchequer, said an official.

CAG, however, said of the production figures submitted to the CCO by 19 prior allottees in West Bengal, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra, there were mismatches in eight. Two allottees reported less  to the CCO  than they did to state governments and six  reported more.

Conditions prescribed in the Coal Mining Development and Production Agreement were not properly monitored, the CAG said in its report on auction of coal mines that was tabled in Parliament today.

The CAG observed the CCO failed to ensure compliance with mine closure guidelines issued by the coal ministry. Officials, however, said the CAG report has crossed its brief since it was meant to audit blocks given out through e-auction. It was not meant to audit blocks given out under the prior mechanism of screening committee which have been cancelled by the Supreme Court.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 27 2016 | 12:27 AM IST

Next Story