The Supreme Court ruled last week that it was not necessary for the debt recovery tribunal to always cross-examine a witness. Evidence could be taken by affidavits also. The court made this clarification in view of the ambiguity in the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Rules 1997.
The ruling was made while upholding the validity of the Act, which was challenged in several high courts. The Bench, comprising Justice B N Kirpal, Justice Y K Sabharwal and Justice K G Balakrishnan, said the provision regarding cross-examination of witnesses had not been happily worded. The reason for setting up the banking tribunals was to speed up disposal of claims and Parliament thought it proper to include the principles of natural justice in the law.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
