EPFO to appoint actuary firm for its pension and insurance schemes

The approved consultant will be empanelled with the EPFO headquarters in New Delhi for a tenure of three years

epfo
Shiva Rajora New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Nov 17 2022 | 8:53 PM IST
The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) is in the process of appointing an actuary firm for the purpose of providing consultancy services to EPFO on matters related to various pension and insurance schemes that it administers.

The statutory body — under the Ministry of Labour & Employment — has issued a request for proposal (RFP) to appoint an actuary or an actuarial firm to study the Employee Pension Scheme (EPS)-1995 and suggest measures to enhance the benefits under the scheme keeping sustainability of the scheme intact.

“The appointed actuary/actuarial firm shall make projections on impact of various amendments/changes in the Employees’ Pension Scheme during the tenure of appointment,” the proposal said.

The approved consultant will be empanelled with the EPFO headquarters in New Delhi for a tenure of three years. 

The actuary firm will also carry out analysis of any new pension scheme of the EPFO during its tenure and it may include checking the long-term viability of the scheme or determining the long-term contribution rates among other things.

“The appointed actuary will also make projections of the impact of various amendments in the Employees’ Deposit-Linked Insurance (EDLI)- 76 Schemes like changing the criteria of giving benefits to the family members/ nominees/ dependents of an EDLI member from “death while in service (i.e. an employee who is a member)” to “death as an EPF member (member who has not withdrawn his EPF accumulations),” the proposal notes.

The actuary will also carry out annual valuation of EDLI Fund and study the impact of recent Supreme Court judgement on EPS-95.

SC earlier this month upheld the 2014 amendment to EPS, which caps the basic salary of an employee at Rs 15,000 a month for the pension component derived from it to be calculated. However, the apex court invalidated the other amendment of an additional contribution of 1.16 per cent by employees and gave six months for the authorities to generate funds or to make relevant changes to the scheme.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :pension schemeEPFOinsurance schemesEmployees Provident FundEPFemployeesSupreme CourtHigh court judgesPensionsEPS scheme

Next Story