Ex-Maharashtra officer cites irregularities in land transfer for Lavasa project

According to Kumar, KVDC had no authority to transfer the land and, therefore, the land transfer was illegal

Image
Sanjay Jog Mumbai
Last Updated : Oct 20 2012 | 12:07 AM IST

The Lavasa story took another twist today after Ramesh Kumar, former additional chief secretary of Maharashtra’s revenue department, revealed the state government did not take any action on his report citing irregularities in the project development. Kumar, who retired in September 2010, had mentioned in his report submitted in June 2010 that the Krishna Valley Development Corporation (KVDC) gave a large chunk of land, meant for irrigation purpose, to private parties for commercial use.

On Thursday, police officer turned lawyer-activist Y P Singh — who had dragged Union agriculture minister Sharad Pawar, his nephew Ajit and daughter Supriya Sule into the Lavasa controversy — had said Kumar had objected to the allotment of KVDC land to Lavasa project. Singh alleged that as a punishment, the state government dropped Kumar’s name as member of the Maharshtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT). According to Kumar, KVDC had no authority to transfer the land and, therefore, the land transfer was illegal.

“Around 100 tribal cultivators’ land was purchased, when tribal lands cannot be bought without the government’s permission.” Kumar said no reference whatsoever was made to the state government. He also alleged that the irregularities in Lavasa development led to financial losses for the state.

The former IAS officer clarified he did not face any harassment from the state government.

“However, I have gone through an unpleasant phase. I was selected for the post of member MAT in, January 2011. But the state government cancelled my recommendation after keeping it pending for more than four months.”

He said he later approached the high court and the Supreme Court. Now the matter is pending before the central government.

According to Singh, state Industries Minister Narayan Rane suppressed Kumar’s objections. However, Rane justified his decision, saying he had taken decisions according to the Hill Station Development Act.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 20 2012 | 12:07 AM IST

Next Story