FDI in multi-brand retail to be a political decision: DIPP

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 3:38 AM IST

A decision on foreign investment in multi-brand retail would be taken by the political leadership of the country, R P Singh, secretary in the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, has said.

"Finally, the call has to be taken by the political leadership," he said, adding that his department is a "little guarded" because of "genuine concerns expressed" in the July 5 concept paper.

Unlike Defence, where DIPP had suggested 74 per cent FDI, it had left the issue of overseas investment caps open for debate in multi-brand retail.

Expressing hope that a decision would be taken by October, Singh said, "We would like to take the views of stakeholders. I am trying to find a solution, which we think is optimal."

The issue is considered politically sensitive as over 90 per cent of India's retail trade is in the unorganised sector -- with kirana shops employing as many as 33 million people.

FDI is allowed only in single brand retail to the extent of 51 per cent, while 100 per cent is permitted in the cash- and-carry (wholesale) business. Domestic organised industry players are of the opinion that the sector should be opened up to foreign investment.

Single brand retail is mostly in sportswear and luxury brands.

Meanwhile, Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma is trying to allay concerns of possible job losses. "I definitely won't agree that there will be loss of jobs due to FDI," Sharma had said in Singapore recently.

Bharti Group chief Sunil Mittal, who supported the move, opined that mere cash-and-carry was not enough. "Until we have end-to-end possibility, it won't work," Mittal said. His group has a joint venture in the cash-and-carry segment with global giant Wal-Mart.

If allowed, global retailers like Wal-Mart, Tesco, Carrefour and Metro would be free to open front-end outlets for selling an array of products.

Singh said that his department is sure India would be benefitted if overseas investment was allowed in Defence production. This was the reason for the department proposing a high FDI cap of 74 per cent in the sector, he said, adding that even 100 per cent would be desirable.

However, the issue becomes more sensitive when it comes to retail, he said.

"In Defence, we were 100 per cent sure that it will be a win-win situation, and it means nothing but good for the country's GDP and manufacturing sector...As far as multi-brand retail, there are some concerns," he said.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 15 2010 | 3:59 PM IST

Next Story