Notwithstanding the Centre's grant of the Viability Gap Funding (VGF) of Rs 1920 crore, bidders did not find the project attractive and viable. MTHL will connect South Mumbai to Navi Mumbai directly.
MMRDA's joint project director Dilip Kawathkar told Business Standard "MMRDA has not received a single bid for the project. However, MMRDA in consultation with the state government will develop the MTHL project.''
However, a government official, who did not want to be identified, said bidders prefer to stay away from the project in view of the policy and regulatory uncertainty, hurdles in the land acquisition, opposition from political parties and various organisations in toll collection. Besides, companies were reluctant to take major risks considering the huge requirement of finances. MMRDA may carry out project development through cash transfer or annuity basis.
Today's is the third time when the state government through its undertakings were failed to get bids for MTHL project. MTHL was tendered in 2008 when Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani led companies had separately submitted their tenders but they were scrapped. Subsequently, MTHL was re-tendered for the second time in 2009 but did not receive enough response.
Thereafter, the project was tendered again last year and five bidders were short listed by MMRDA.
Industry official put the onus on the government and its undertakings for indecisiveness in project implementation.
It must be mentioned here that IRB chief Virendra Virendra Mhaiskar last week in his letter addressed to MMRDA had said, "We deeply regret to inform you that we are unable to participate in the bidding process of the project and the reasons are beyond the boundaries of this project. Unfortunately the experience that we have had in one of the infrastructure projects in Maharashtra in the city of Kolhapur has shattered our confidence to invest in the urban infrastructure projects especially in the state of Maharashtra."
He further noted that the company's lenders were also shying away from committing their support to MTHL as the response of the state government on private investments adversely strikes at the very concept of private public partnership.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)