These estimates will be put before the GST Council on Friday for a decision on whether the borrowing arrangement of last year involving back-to-back loans to states can be extended to the current year as well.
“While the GST revenues may see a recovery in FY22, there will still be a gap between the compensation requirement and the compensation cess available… if the Council decides to extend the same borrowing arrangement on the same principles as last year, a borrowing of close to Rs 1.6 trillion can be opted for,” said a government official. “But it all boils down to what the states feel about this,” he added.
The Centre is expecting GST collection to fall below the Rs 1-trillion mark in June, as indicated by the slowdown in e-way bill generation in May. After GST implementation in July 2017, states were promised compensation for five years for any revenue shortfall, assuming a 14 per cent annual growth rate, since states lost autonomy over indirect taxes.
Compensation cess is levied on a few items in the 28 per cent slab, such as automobiles, cigarettes, and aerated drinks.
While the Budget for 2021-22 has estimated GST revenues to grow 17 per cent over last year, the target appears challenging, given how the localised lockdowns across the country have impacted supplies.
A government official pointed out that a 17 per cent growth translates into an average monthly gross GST revenue of Rs 1.1 trillion. “We have overestimated the compensation requirement for FY22.
We expect the actual requirement to be much lower. But in that case, one can use the excess borrowed amount to partially make up for the previous year’s gap,” he said.
Last year, the Centre had estimated a cess shortfall of Rs 2.35 trillion for 2020-21, of which Rs 1.1 trillion attributed to GST implementation was met by borrowing. Another Rs 70,000 crore came by way of cess collection, leaving a gap of around Rs 50,000 crore (attributed to Covid-19), which will be paid to the states in due course. Some Rs 1.1 trillion was borrowed by the Centre and passed on to the states as back-to-back loans. The Centre had proposed two options to the states to address the compensation cess shortfall.
Either borrow Rs 1.1 trillion where the interest cost will be paid off through the extended cess period or borrow the entire Rs 2.35 trillion where cess will be used for paying only the principal, not the interest.
Under the first option, the states were additionally allowed to borrow by 0.5 per cent of their respective economic size from the markets.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)