Gujarat HC admits petition to review its order on IGST benefits

Petition was heard by a special bench that had given earlier order. Matter posted for hearing on April 9

Delhi and Puducherry lock horns with Centre over IGST distribution
The court also upheld the validity of another amendment to the rule that allows refunds to those who only avail of exemption on basic Customs duty and pay IGST on raw material
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Mar 09 2021 | 1:15 AM IST
The Gujarat High Court has admitted a petition to review its verdict of upholding the constitutional validity of amendments in the GST rules by the government to deny integrated goods and service tax (IGST) refunds to exporters who have taken advance authorisation (AA) benefits.

The petition was heard by a special bench that had given the earlier order. It agreed that detailed arguments would have to be heard. The court posted the matter for hearing on April 9, said Abhishek Rastogi, counsel for exporters.

Exporters were earlier entitled to import raw material without payment of IGST under the AA licence, and pay IGST on exports and claim rebate (refund) paid on exports. They received the benefits of rebate of IGST initially.

However, the government then amended sub-rule (10) of Rule 96 of the central GST through a notification dated September 4, 2018. It denied refunds on IGST on exports if exporters enjoyed AA benefits with effect from October 23, 2017, Rastogi, partner at Khaitan & Co, explained.

Earlier, Gujarat HC had upheld the validity of this rule.

The court also upheld the validity of another amendment to the rule that allows refunds to those who only avail of exemption on basic Customs duty and pay IGST on raw material. This amendment was made effective with retrospective effect.

This means that those who claimed a refund under this option need to pay back IGST on raw material, along with interest and avail of input tax credit.

After the verdict, the directorate of revenue intelligence had issued notices to exporters and initiated proceedings against them over the issue.

"The objective of AA is to give working capital benefits to the Indian exporters and in case this restriction of IGST exemption is implemented by the impugned rules in case of those exporters who are exporting after payment of duty, the entire objective of AA benefits gets defeated," Rastogi said. 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Gujarat High CourtIGSTGST rules

Next Story