Higher judiciary is over ambitious: Chidambaram

Image
BS Reporter New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 2:02 AM IST

Cautioning the higher judiciary of being “over ambitious” at times, Home Minister P Chidambaram on Saturday said there had been occasions in the country when an ambitious court tended to believe there was a judicial solution to problems.

He pointed out the burdening of courts because of the large number of cases, the lack of good judges, and the ambition of the judiciary as some of the ailments of the present day legal system. Chidambaram was speaking at the KN Katju Memorial Lecture, 2011.

The home minister also said that though he didn’t agree with the over ambition of the judiciary at times, yet the judicial activism had helped enlarge the ambit of the fundamental rights of citizens.

“Like any other institution that has reached a ripe and old age, the judiciary is under stress. Another cause of stress is that the judiciary, especially the higher judiciary, is over ambitious. An ambitious court tends to think that there is a judicial solution to its problems,” Chidambaram said at the lecture. He added that in his view, the Indian judiciary was not afflicted by any malady that was incurable.

Chidambaram empahsised that it was the right of every citizen to have clean judiciary that would do justice according to the law of the country. “Litigation in the country is no longer a rare occurrence, so it the right of every citizen to have a clean judiciary. Judges have the power of life and death. Those who have occasion to go to the courts, and there are many, have vested interest in a clean judiciary. People go to courts with the hope and expectation that justice will be done. The least that they expect from the system is an honest judge,” the home minister added.

Being a lawyer himself, the home minister said the judicial activism of courts, especially the Supreme Court, in enlarging the ambit of fundamental rights enshrined in the constitution and creating a human rights jurisdiction must be applauded.

Blaming the failure of legislative and executive system in the country at times, retired Supreme Court judge, Kuldip Singh, argued that the judiciary had never failed to deliver.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 24 2011 | 12:59 AM IST

Next Story