The Ministry of Agriculture, in March 2011, released guidelines for spending Rs 300 crore in implementing an urban Vegetable Initiative aimed at providing India’s middle classes more locally grown vegetables. Nine months on, ISPR’s Sourjya Bhowmick does a status check on how much progress has been made in this interesting initiative
When launched then, the Agriculture Ministry defined the objective as being one to ‘set in motion a virtuous cycle of production and income for farmers and assured supply for consumers’.
The programme was launched in urban centres, which have a population of 1,000,000. Efforts outlined included organising vegetable growers into associations, figuring the processing and sorting to post-harvest management.
ISPR Foundation filed a Right To Information (RTI) petition seeking details regarding the progress of the Vegetable Initiative and the money spent for the last six to seven months ie from inception till now. The response from the Department of Agriculture and Co-operation is mentioned below:
Progress of vegetable initiative
a) Baseline survey initiated in 28 states.
b) Work on formation of cluster and Farmer Producer Organisation (FPO) initiated in all 28 states.
c) Market aggregator has initiated in 11 states.
Expenditure incurred (till now)
a) Out of Rs 300 crore, an amount of Rs 154 crore has been released to 28 States. During the initial phase, till September, 2011, expenditure is mainly on survey, ‘planting material development’ and formation of FPO’s.
b) Presently, there is no proposal to increase the expenditure over and above Rs 300 crore.
Exceeding budgets
Looking back at the Agriculture Ministry’s documents, they say 25 per cent of total allocations ‘must be utilised for baseline survey, promotion of Farmers Association, tie up with financial institutions, post-harvest management, storage, transport and marketing infrastructure.’
The Ministry’s response to us on the other hand seems to suggest that more than 50 per cent has already been spent on just baseline surveys, formation of Farmer Producer Organisation and planting material development. That would mean storage, transport and tie-ups with financial institutions would have to be squeezed into Rs 154 crores, whereas, it that should have been included in 25 per cent of the total amount.
The remaining Rs 146 crore is to be incurred on components like production of seedlings, area expansion of vegetables, protected cultivation, organic farming, marketing and human resource development, apart from the other factors that should have been catered to by now. This would, at least in our reading of it, be a stretch.
Reprinted with permission from www.indiaspend.com
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
