The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in its submission to the Allahabad High Court, which is hearing a case filed against the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), said that the resolution of stressed assets through this route was a commercial decision taken by the central bank and creditors and it should not be thrust upon the judiciary.
“Control over company is not a divine right. If the promoters default, the creditor will take over the company and manage it. Thus, the IBC is a creditor-driven legislation,” said the RBI in its submission.
In a circular dated February 12, the central bank mandated that banks should classify even one day’s delay in debt servicing as default. The notification mandates resolution proceedings against stressed accounts to be completed in 180 days.
A petition was filed by Independent Power Producers Association of India (IPPAI) in the Allahabad High Court against the IBC proceedings of the RBI.
The Centre in its submission to the Allahabad High Court in July sought regulatory relief and time extension for close to dozen power projects with debt exposure of around Rs 1 trillion, out of a total of 34 stressed assets.
Hitting back at the Centre, the RBI said there was no recognised category such as “genuine defaulters”. The law should be applied equally to all. If it is not, then it is a violation of Article 14 of the IBC.