Odisha opposes proposal for price pooling of coal

Says it is not relevant to the power generating companies located very close to coal mine

Image
Press Trust of India Bhubaneswar
Last Updated : Nov 21 2012 | 3:21 PM IST

Odisha government has opposed Centre's proposal to introduce pooling price of coal, saying it was not relevant to the power generating companies located very close to coal mines.

"This particular proposition of blending price of the imported coal with that of domestic coal possibly does not make any sense to those generating companies located very close to the coal mines," said state Energy Secretary P K Jena in a letter to Chairman of the Central Electricity Authority (CEA).

He said Odisha is a coal bearing state and coal of "F" and "G" grade, which is solely utilised for thermal power generation, is abundantly available in the state.

Jena said the proposal to transport indigenous coal from the pitheads of coal bearing states to non-coal bearing states and transporting imported coal to different pithead plants did not appear to be economically prudent and would put avoidable cost of double transportation on the consumer.

Claiming that the switch-over to pooled price would benefit private power producers at the cost of the state and general public, the letter said the basic objective of importing coal was to meet the Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA) commitments by Coal India Limited.

"If pooling of price is followed, it will ensure subsidy to those power plants which do not have coal linkage at the cost of those power plants which are already having coal linkage," Jena said in the letter.

Jena said that the reported cost of Rs 4,500 per tonne under proposed pooling price concept would result in likely price increase of coal by Rs 100 per tonne and consequential increase of electricity tariff by 7 to 8 paise per unit.

Jena said the logic behind such a proposal of introduction of pooling price in case of coal and putting the consequential power tariff burden on the consumers of coal bearing states as well as the non-coal bearing states was not in the national interest.

He said if the Centre goes ahead with such a policy of providing Fuel-Price Security (FPS), it may consider to bear additional cost of FPS and exempt the "poverty ridden coal bearing States like Odisha from subsidising such avoidable prohibitive costs".

"Therefore, we are of the view that the blending price of imported coal with that of the domestic coal is not at all good economic jurisdiction and therefore, should not be considered," Jena said in the letter to the CEA.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 21 2012 | 3:21 PM IST

Next Story