RIL had gone to ATE against the OERC order. While admitting the case for hearing, ATE had refused to give any interim relief to the company and scheduled the hearing of the case on March 24.
On March 4, OERC, after a suo motto proceeding, had revoked the licenses of the three discoms - North Eastern Electricity Supply Company of Odisha Ltd (Nesco), Western Electricity Supply Company of Odisha Ltd (Wesco) and Southern Electricity Supply Company of Odisha Ltd (Southco). Sources said, OERC had built up its case against the RIL firms basing on violations of provisions under section 17 (licensee not to do certain things) and section 19 (revocation of licence) of the Electricity Act. It will also defend its decision before the ATE on the same premises.
Section 17 said, no licensee shall, without prior approval of the appropriate commission, undertake any transaction to acquire by purchase or takeover or otherwise, the utility of any other licensee or merge his utility with the utility of any other licensee, with other sub sections. Sources said, the RIL firms are liable to attract action under this section 17 as no permission of the commission was taken when 51 per cent share in each of the discoms was first transferred to Bombay Suburban Electric Supply (BSES) in 1999 and then to RIL when it took over BSES in 2002. Similarly, section 19 also empowers the OERC to revoke the licenses. Under the section, the licensees have failed in controlling the aggregate technical and commercial (AT&C) loss and defaulted in payment of Bulk Supply Price persistently, among others.
"Licences can be revoked if one of the conditions prescribed in Section 19 of the Act is satisfied. But in the present case which is one of the rarest of rare case all the conditions described in Section 19 of the Act are satisfied", read the OERC order.
"OERC order clearly states 'non-performance' of the discoms are the reasons for the revocation of the licenses. The arguments will be made on the merits", said Suresh Mohapatra, state energy secretary.
In 2005 too, the license of the discoms were revoked, but they had managed to get a counter order from the Supreme Court. However, when situations did not improve, OERC had sou moto initiated a case in 2013 to revoke the license of the discoms.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
