The Patna High Court yesterday reserved order on the contempt proceedings against Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) director Joginder Singh for delaying filing of chargesheets in the Rs 950-crore fodder scam.
A division bench consisting of Justices S N Jha and S J Mukhopadhyay, monitoring the investigations into the scam, reserved the order after hearing solicitor-general K N Bhatt, appearing on behalf of Singh and CBI joint director (east), U N Biswas.
Biswas, who sought to explain the factual position on certain queries of the court on the directors order to him (Biswas) to withold prosecution in the case and reference of the matter to the attorney-general, submitted a chronology of facts.
He said D R Kartikeyan, special director (east and south), disposed of the files concerning the case with his comments on March 5. It reached the directors office on March 7.
Singh, who was away to Paris, returned to Delhi on March 9 and later sanctioned prosecution in the case on March 11.
Subsequently, Singh asked him to withold the prosecution to seek the attorney-generals opinion in the light of the Supreme Courts direction in regard to any differences of opinion among the officials, Biswas said. He said, the directors opinion in this connection was not malafide and not at all aimed at delaying the chargesheet in the case.
Bhatt, in his submission, said that the case was not truncated and there was no external or internal pressure on Singh to delay the chargesheet.
They are making their best efforts for fair and impartial probe even working on Saturday and Sunday, he said.
Bhatt urged the court to drop the contempt proceedings against Singh. Regarding the three months time sought by the CBI chief to complete investigations into the conspiracy angle of the scam, Biswas said the conspiracy runs through in all the 48 cases registered by the CBI in connection with the scam.
It is loot and plunder of state exchequer and we want to bring the investigations to a logical end, he said.
The hearing on the CBI plea on extension of time to complete investigation into the conspiracy angle of the case, however, remained inclusive.
The court fixed May 19 as the next day for hearing.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
