It also suggested a cap on diesel subsidy by oil marketing companies (OMCs) at Rs 6 a litre, which along with the rise it recommends would collectively save at least Rs 40,000 crore of the government’s subsidy burden.
On the tussle over export parity pricing for OMCs between the finance and petroleum ministries, the panel recommended against any change in the present trade parity pricing formula, despite a note on its stand from the finance ministry.
At present, the prices of petrol and diesel are calculated by taking into account 2.5 per cent Customs duty to the refinery gate price, along with freight rates. The finance ministry wanted to save Rs 13,000 crore on underrecovery every year. “We found that there is hardly any difference between EPP and TPP. Hence, it was suggested that since the government has already decided to eventually free the diesel price, there is no need to tinker with the existing pricing formula, which, even if modified, will not solve the problem of mounting under-recoveries incurred on sales of controlled products, mainly due to high international crude prices and depreciation of Indian rupee,” Parikh said.
The committee, headed by former planning commission member Parikh, had P K Singh, joint secretary from the petroleum ministry; S Garg, joint secretary from the finance ministry; IIM Ahmedabad professor S K Barua and petroleum ministry joint secretary R K Singh. According to petroleum ministry sources, the recommendations of the committee would be taken up before the cabinet by the end of November or early December.
The limit for subsidised cylinders be reduced from the present nine to six cylinders per annum to each household and the DBTL scheme be restricted to identified families based on an exclusion criteria
Meanwhile, it has suggested a fresh formula for upstream companies such as Oil and Natural Gas Corporation and Oil India under the New Exploration Licensing Policy regime on a slab-based discount scheme. If the crude oil price is below $80 a barrel, the upstream contribution would be 40 per cent; between $80-120 per barrel, it would be 40 per cent, adding 0.25 per cent for each $1 barrel increase beyond $80 a barrel. If prices are above $120 a barrel, the upstream contribution was suggested at half the crude price.
Amid the buzz about GAIL getting out of the subsidy burden, the panel suggested with the reduction in availability of APM gas, GAIL’s contribution should not exceed the gross profit made on sale of LPG, after allowing for a reasonable profit to be retained.
| PANEL PROPOSALS |
FUEL PRICING
|
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)