Obliterating all past records, July will see the passage of the largest even number of government bills through Parliament, in one month. The government has already introduced 16 bills in this session, but the list could have more than doubled, had the number of bills cleared through the Finance Bill been added to it.
Finance (No.2) Bill, 2019 has within its pages, amendments to 17 acts, excluding those related to direct and indirect taxes, amendments of Goods and Services Act and those for changes in earlier Finance Acts. Of these 17, most have some monetary aspects, but not all would qualify as money bills. Yet, as they are now part of the Finance Bill, they would qualify as money bills, which means the Rajya Sabha will have hardly any scope to debate on them and in any case, they have to be cleared post-haste within July as part of the Budget. The number of bills in the Miscellaneous section of the Finance Bill, at 18, reached its highest in Budget 2018-19.
As expected, some of the changes made in the relevant acts are fairly lightweight like the change in the termination date for the erstwhile Unit Trust of India, extended from March 31, 2019 to March 31, 2021. But others are significant, like the amendment to the General Insurance (Nationalisation) Act. Clause 148 of the Finance (No 2) Bill, 2019 has replaced the words 'only four companies' to 'up to four companies'. This clears the way for the merger of one or more of the public sector insurance companies, as per the plan announced in Budget 2018.
The jury is also out on whether the amendments to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, to give it more powers to deal with the boards of non-banking financial companies as well as taking back the regulatory powers over housing finance companies from the National Housing Bank, needed the cover of the Finance Bill. These are far reaching changes and mostly welcome from the point of view of reducing the risks in the financial sector. It is also possible that had they been introduced as standalone bills, the standing committee on finance would have demanded the right to examine those with consequent delays. Note that the changes would not have affected the government’s powers to provide additional financial support to them, as as the Budget has promised. Analysts would have to take a call if the financial support to public sector banks of a one time six months' partial credit guarantee for first loss of up to 10 per cent for credits offered to NBFCs should have been rung in without the simultaneous enhancement of the powers of RBI. If both has to run concurrent, then the government has been correct to make the changes in the powers of RBI vis a vis the NBFCs through the Finance Bill.