Q&A: B N Srikrishna, Chairman, FSLRC

'Issue of avoiding turf war between regulators to be considered'

Image
Indivjal Dhasmana
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 1:57 AM IST

The government appointed a 10-member Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission (FSLRC) on March 24 to rewrite and clean-up financial sector laws to bring them in tune with the current requirements. Retired Supreme Court Judge B N Srikrishna, who chairs the Commission, tells Indivjal Dhasmana that the issue of avoiding turf war between regulators would be considered by the panel and that would include the matter of super regulator to regulate watchdogs. The panel has been asked to submit report to the government within 24 months. Excerpts of the interview.

Last year, turf war had erupted between Sebi and Irda over ULIPs. To avoid that what can be your thinking for hybrid products like ULIPs that come in regulations of more than one watchdog?
Yes, that is one of the issues to be flagged and considered. Another issue is whether there can be a super regulator to oversee and co-ordinate other regulators. 

Can there be a new law for information technology relating to financial services?

I see no reason for this. But if people give us critical inputs and reasons for this, we may examine its feasibility.

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) Act is yet to come up. Will it be wise enough to review it, since it may take into account all the modern factors governing the pension sector?
The question is not one of reviewing it, but of seeing that there is no conflict or inconsistency between that Act and other Acts so as to create impedance in their working. 

Could new type of laws like that happened in case of Direct Taxes Code emerge out of your rewriting financial laws?

That too can be examined for feasibility. 

Financial services are supposed to be the next engine of growth. Which way the rewriting of financial sector laws help in boosting growth in this area?

By making things smoother for transactions in financial services and removing roadblocks that may be identified.

Is two-year time frame given for submitting recommendations enough to study over 60 Acts and numerous rules and regulations dealing with the financial sector, many of them considered archaic?
I do not think we will need 17 years! We have a set of experts and researchers who may be constituted into smaller groups to study different aspects and the Commission can take an overview of the work of the smaller groups and produce a report within the given time frame.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 31 2011 | 1:26 AM IST

Next Story