The lure of higher returns, sweet talk from agents and the uncle/aunt/neighbour who got rich in six months because of 100 per cent plus returns annually, ensure that there are enough investors who are ready to part with their life’s savings.
In the south, there were emu schemes – birds which are in demand for their meat and eggs – that offered to triple the money in five years. And plantation schemes, cattle schemes and chit funds have existed for decades.
While the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has started a cracking down on collective investment schemes, things in many cases, have already blown out of hand. If the market regulator would stop these entities from raising anymore money, they will start defaulting.
The promoter and top management, as usual, will run away. The agents and investors will be left holding the can. There will be more suicides – something, no one wants. But if Sebi and the various state governments wait for complaints, more people will be duped. Anyway, these schemes will be exposed sooner or later.
In such circumstances, Sebi in association with the respective state governments have to play it carefully. A few suggestions for whatever they are worth:
- First, the respective governments should step in and take over these companies immediately, irrespective of the fact whether there are complaints or not.
- Freeze the promoter and top management’s accounts, offices, and properties. Sell them and create a corpus.
- Tell investors that they will be paid their principle amounts plus an ‘X’ rate of interest after three- five years.
- Get good investment managers to manage this money through 80 per cent debt and 20 per cent equity schemes.
- Sebi should set up a division that will supervise the corpus of these schemes and a monthly/quarter report should be maintained.
- Declare the NAVs of the scheme in leading papers every month.
- Agents of these schemes should be banned from selling any investment product forever. They should also be sued and if found guilty, jailed.
In the past, the Centre was able to take this hard decision in case of US-64 (though it was not a chit fund neither did it cheat customers, but the high returns it promised became impossible to pay) and investors were able to get back their principal with reasonable returns after a decade.
It’s time state governments took active interest in eradicating chit funds. And, stern action is required towards politicians engaging in such activities.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)