Associate Sponsors

SC-appointed CEC urges Odisha govt to reconcile penalty figure for miners

In its order, the SC had asked to recover 100% compensation as opposed to the 30% recommended by CEC

mines, mining, miners
Photo: Shutterstock
BS Reporter Bhubaneswar
Last Updated : Dec 07 2017 | 7:35 PM IST
The central empowered committee (CEC), a panel appointed by the Supreme Court (SC), has instructed the Odisha government to rework the penalties for miners in a case of overproduction of iron ore and manganese ore.

The apex court in a judgment dated August 2 this year had directed the state government to issue demand notices to all miners for recovering the cost of excess production. The court verdict was in a case filed by the NGO Common Cause. The court held that the compensation amount should be the rationalised figure as calculated by CEC. 

In its order, the SC had asked to recover 100 per cent compensation as opposed to the 30 per cent recommended by CEC.

Accordingly, the state government had issued two demand notices to some 150-odd errant miners. The first notice, seeking recovery of Rs 17,576.17 crore, was slapped on mining companies for producing ore beyond environment clearance (EC) limits. 

In the second demand notice, the government sought to extract Rs 2,900 crore for violations of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Air & Water Acts and overproduction in violation of the limits set in the mining plan prescribed by Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM) and consent to operate granted by the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB). The latest notice has been slapped on 23 miners violating the Forest (Conservation) Act and 151 others for other statutory non-compliances.

“We have got the letter from the CEC. They have asked us to reconcile penalty figures for some miners who had petitioned the apex court for reconsideration. The figures have to be adjusted against the unsold inventory of some miners”, said a state government official.

At a recent meeting of the CEC involving the state government and miners, the mine owners had pleaded for rationalisation of the penalty worked out under EC. “In working out a revised figure for EC violation, we had requested for considering some anomalies like piled up, unsold ore at the mine heads. If this is factored in, the compensation amount could be pruned.”, said a leading mine owner.

Additionally, the miners have prayed to the apex court to consider their plea for extension of the deadline for paying the cost of excess production. They have also pleaded to the court to permit them to pay the amount in tranches.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story