Last week, Commerce Secretary Rajeev Kher said the ensuing FTP would address the concerns of exporters on the slowing in several key markets, such as the European Union and Japan, even as a lot of policy developments and diversification measures are being worked out on the challenges in merchandise export. He was silent on when a new FTP would see the light of day.
It has been about six months since a Union ministry under the leadership of Narendra Modi took over. A short time to show tangible results but not that short for taking visible action. In 1991, P Chidambaram unveiled major trade reforms within a week of taking over as commerce minister. He went on amending policy through the year, responding to various developments before coming out with a new Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act and the first five-year Export-Import Policy in 1992. Kamal Nath in 2004 and Anand Sharma in 2009 presented new FTPs within weeks of presentation of the Budget. They could act swiftly because they were clear about what to do and had enough of the confidence of finance ministers and prime ministers of the time. That does not seem the case now.
Nirmala Sitharaman, the minister in charge of commerce, had said bilateral trade treaties were being examined to see how far these had benefited Indian manufacturers. There is no indication on the direction in regard to existing treaties or those under negotiation. She had talked of a comprehensive review of the Special Economic Zones scheme. No changes have been announced. The second task force on reducing of transaction costs in exports gave its recommendations in July. The high-powered inter-ministerial committee on boosting of exports from the medium, small and micro enterprises sector gave a report last year. The task group for the diamond sector, aimed to make India an international trading hub for rough diamonds, also gave its report last year. All these reports/reviews give enough material to make meaningful changes in the FTP. However, the urge to present a very different FTP seems to have taken precedence.
The Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) can advise the minister in formulating an FTP but the power to notify one is with the latter. In a situation where the minister wants a very different FTP but the DGFT feels the existing one deserves to continue with appropriate fine-tuning, delay is bound to occur. The surprise is that vague directions from the top have come so late, making the needed changes in the FTP wait till next year.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
