AAP win unlikely to mean competitive populism

AAP volunteers celebrate the party's victory in the Delhi Assembly polls, at Patel Nagar in New Delhi on Tuesday.
Arup Roychoudhury New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 11 2015 | 12:53 AM IST
The Aam Aadmi Party’s comprehensive victory in the Delhi election is not necessarily a mandate for a left-leaning, welfare dole-based economics, and the results are not likely to lead to competitive populism between Kejriwal and the Narendra Modi government at the Centre, experts say.

In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, when the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) got the most decisive parliamentary majority in 30 years, many viewed it as a victory for right-leaning economic thought, with emphasis on free market capitalism, higher private spending, curbed subsidies and lower tax rates, over the left-of-centre school of thought, market by welfare schemes, increased subsidies and other populist measures, and massive government spending.

This view was backed by the fact that Modi had campaigned with promises of jobs, infrastructure, and economic development, rather than doling out freebies. Back to the present, and with the AAP promising cheap electricity and free water, among other things, is there a possibility that populism is back? Economists think otherwise.

“The premise that the Delhi elections were about populism is not entirely correct. Maybe partially it was a factor but a majority of the voters seem to have taken note of other issues like corruption and safety. Corruption seems to be the biggest issue that resonated with voters this time,” said N R Bhanumurthy at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.

He said the government at the Centre had not shied away from public welfare schemes and initiatives like the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana and Direct Benefit Transfers were necessary. “The way the government goes about its economic policymaking will not change drastically after this result,” he said.

“The people of India or any of the states have never voted for any particular economic school of thought. They vote for more particular issues,” said Arun Maira, member of the erstwhile Planning Commission. “This line between the right and the left school of economic thoughts is created by the media and the intellectuals.”

He noted the Modi government had never once suggested cutting on subsidies but on better targeting. So, he felt, the Delhi results would not compel Modi and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley to curb reform measures in lieu of bigger populist schemes.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 11 2015 | 12:14 AM IST

Next Story