Gunit Chadha, the founder-managing director of APAC Financial Services, takes pride in the fact that his firm secured funding from Multiples Alternate Asset Management in December last year, three months after the shadow banking crisis had blown up. “It tells you that a good business model backed by strong risk management will continue to attract funding. There is significant private equity (PE) interest in funding differentiated non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) today,” he said.
But will it ever be like the boom you saw between FY15 and HIFY18 when PEs had pumped in $2.36 billion into NBFCs?
“Over the last few weeks, we have had conversations with numerous NBFCs. Several of them are contemplating to shore up their equity capital,” said Rajeev Suneja, partner at Deloitte India. He, like many others in the industry, will not put a number as to how much by way of PE money is in the pipeline for NBFCs to tap into, but would like to believe that Advent International’s move last week to infuse Rs 1,000 crore into Aditya Birla Capital is the lung-opener for the business. This level of optimism though appears tough to buy into.
While the central bank has spoken on the need for India Inc to have skin in the game (promoters having enough equity), somehow corner-room ears in NBFCs never gave this serious enough thought. The blowout at the Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS), the unravelling at Dewan Housing Finance, and the tightening of asset-liability management norms has woken up everybody. And despite RBI’s move to hike banks’ single counter-party exposure to an NBFC to 20 per cent of their tier-capital (from 15 per cent), or the partial-guarantee scheme to purchase highly rated pooled assets from them, the truth is the needle has hardly moved.
Who gets to be on the podium?
“The governance premium has dramatically gone up; equally business models of NBFCs will come under sharp focus. This is good, not bad” says Chadha; who adds “And I am clear that there can’t be two ways when it comes to governance -- you have to be and can be in control of it even though this may not always hold true for the business model which is subject to more externalities”.
And on Monday, India Ratings cut its outlook on NBFCs to negative from stable; and also the growth forecast for FY20 to 10-12 per cent from 15 per cent due to funding challenges, slowdown in auto sales, rural infrastructure activity, and the stress in small and medium enterprises. It says there will be a fall in margins and an inability to pass on the funding cost to retail borrowers due to the subdued demand.
If all this was not bad enough, the jury is still out if the two sets of players which were not as matured when the last rounds of PE funding happened will change the playbook – online lending NBFCs and small finance banks (SFBs).
“The scalability of pure-play on-line lending platforms will hold the key to attract PE interest. If they are merely using up capital without a viable business model which can bring the customer acquisition cost curve down with scale, it will not work. Many NBFCs are also investing in their digital platforms”, points out Nadkarni.
Sanjeev Krishnan, Leader (PE and Deals) at PwC is of the view that the exuberance over SFBs may have been a bit overstated; and it is unlikely that the entry of freshly minted SFBs down the line will greatly alter the narrative.
“What I can say is that governance will be up there; some NBFCs with a good sales network can also aspire to secure PE funding,” says Krishnan.
On governance, Chadha points to the fact APAC has Varsha Purandare (former chief credit and risk officer at State Bank of India) as an independent member on its credit committee; and that “all decisions have to be unanimous or the product programme or credit proposal gets declined, with no court of appeal.” Not many NBFCs will stand scrutiny to the high standards which Chadha lays claims to, but what you can’t get away from is there is no court of appeal left for them either.