Stanchart asked to compensate clients
For sending 'thugs' to recover non-existent dues

Explore Business Standard
For sending 'thugs' to recover non-existent dues

| The Commission (a quasi-judicial body set up under the Consumer Protection Act) issued the order on April 20, 2005. The order asked Standard Chartered to pay the compensation in two months. |
| In addition to the compensation, the bank was also asked to pay another Rs 5,000 towards expenses. |
| The incident in question took place in 1996. A Ranganathan, a Standard Chartered customer, held a non resident external account, non resident ordinary account (NRO), foreign currency non resident deposits and non resident non repatriable deposits. |
| Ranganathan had given the bank standing instructions to pay his wife's credit card dues from his NRO account. |
| Subsequently, Ranganathan's wife received a telegram from the bank which said that a cheque for Rs 27,022.35 had been returned on account of insufficient funds. |
| A cheque had not been issued by Ranganathan, and the telegram was followed by "thugs" who called on the card holder and "made threats to her." |
| The order said that Standard Chartered indicated that the incident took place because of a mistake in their computer system. |
| The Commission order said that it was being issued ex parte because Standard Chartered had not sent the relevant representative for the hearing. |
First Published: May 17 2005 | 12:00 AM IST