RBI has raised the issue of enhancing corporate governance norms in public-sector banks with the government and called for action on a priority basis. Kolkata-based UBI reported doubling of net losses in the third quarter, following which its chairperson and managing director Archana Bhargava took voluntary retirement. RBI had asked an external agency to conduct a forensic inquiry in the bank, upon Bhargava’s request, which is also seen as unprecedented.
“With respect to UBI, it is neither shock nor surprise to RBI. Bank chairperson wrote to RBI and finance minister is saying that in the bank, accounts are not classified as NPA (non-performing assets), and requested for forensic audit. So we started forensic audit and the conclusions are found to be valid that bank accounts are not classified as NPA, because of technology or other reasons. This is nothing new that bank chiefs say NPAs gone up due to system-generated NPAs,” said Chakrabarty.
He also highlighted that the bank has suffered losses because of higher provisioning to pension (Rs 625 crore), which was not provided earlier. “It is not only UBI, but many banks have been found to have deferred provision on this regard,” he said.
“These issues point towards issues of corporate governance. We have written to the government of India to take steps and this is not for UBI but for banking system as a whole,” said the outgoing deputy governor.
“It is not a question of one or two banks. We are definitely worried about how the overall system is functioning. We are in dialogue with the government to improve the situation,” said Chakrabarty.
On whether the central bank has asked the government to reduce its stake in public-sector banks in order to provide greater autonomy, which is seen as key for better efficiency, Chakrabarty said while bank performance is ownership-neutral and if government ownership can ensure autonomy in banks, if the management quality can be maintained, there is no need for such a step.
“It is a question of quality of management and autonomy. If government ownership can ensure the autonomy in banks, if the management quality can be maintained, (then) there is no need. But if there is a constraint on that, the government may look forward. Second, there is an issue of budgetary constraint. So, if the government has some limitations, they may think of other options,” he added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)