That’s the conclusion of a report by Swiss bank UBS Group AG’s wealth management arm. The result is surprising since Britain is one of the leaders in sustainability and green energy, having installed more wind turbines at sea than any other nation. At the same time, its high net worth investors are lagging behind the rest of the world on sustainable investing.
“There’s a gap between how we live in the U.K. and how we invest,” Helen McDonald, a director at UBS Wealth Management, said at a briefing in London. “We really are somewhat below the curve here.”
One explanation can be found is that the future of the British economy going forward is less clear than it was before the Brexit referendum in June 2016. The pound has lost nearly 12 percent of its value against the dollar and the kind of deal Prime Minister Theresa May may be able to strike with the European Union remains very uncertain.
Only 39 percent of U.K. investors are optimistic about the country’s economic outlook, according to the UBS report.
That may have contributed to a hesitance to pivot away from traditional investing. Only 20 percent of the people surveyed in the U.K. said their portfolios contain some sustainable element. That’s half the global average, and compares with investors in emerging markets -- 60 percent in China and 53 percent in Brazil say they allocate to these asset classes.
The U.K. investors said they are concerned about lower returns, they doubt that investing green actually generates a real impact, and also cited a lack of track record and an understanding of the sector.
While the sustainable investing subset is nascent compared to financial services overall, evidence is starting to build that taking environmental, social and governance factors, known as ESG, into account when making investment decisions can result in matching or even outperforming benchmarks.
That may have contributed to a hesitance to pivot away from traditional investing. Only 20 percent of the people surveyed in the U.K. said their portfolios contain some sustainable element. That’s half the global average, and compares with investors in emerging markets -- 60 percent in China and 53 percent in Brazil say they allocate to these asset classes.
The U.K. investors said they are concerned about lower returns, they doubt that investing green actually generates a real impact, and also cited a lack of track record and an understanding of the sector.
While the sustainable investing subset is nascent compared to financial services overall, evidence is starting to build that taking environmental, social and governance factors, known as ESG, into account when making investment decisions can result in matching or even outperforming benchmarks.
A global study conducted by HSBC Holdings Plc earlier this month showed that nearly three quarters of institutional investors with an ESG strategy said that their primary reason to do so was financial returns.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)