The meeting between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France, Germany -- the so-called P5+1 -- was making progress however, they said.
Michael Mann, spokesman for the P5+1 chief negotiator at last month's talks in Geneva, Catherine Ashton, said the gathering would continue for a third unscheduled day today.
Also Read
"My sense is that given that there are seven or eight entities involved with their own views it's inevitably going to take time."
He and a second participant said however that it was unlikely to result in an announcement of when Iran will start its promised six-month freeze of parts of its nuclear programme, as agreed in a deal late last month.
"It's difficult to imagine that happening," the second diplomat said. Instead this may be decided in a so far unscheduled meeting of political directors from Iran and the six powers.
Iran's envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Reza Najafi, told reporters late yesterday that the talks were going well, without giving further details. Asked if the negotiations were positive, he said, "Yes."
Najafi said last month that he expected the six months to start in late December or early January. Other diplomats and analysts have said this may be ambitious.
In a major diplomatic breakthrough in Geneva on November 24, Iran undertook to implement the temporary freeze in return for modest relief from UN and Western sanctions that have hit its economy hard.
The Vienna meeting of nuclear, sanctions and finance experts, which began Monday and also involves the IAEA, is aimed at thrashing out how the interim deal will be implemented and how the measures will be monitored by the IAEA.
During the half-year period, Iran and the P5+1 are due to negotiate a "comprehensive" deal aimed at ending for good the standoff over Iran's nuclear programme after a decade of failed attempts and rising tensions.
Iran says its programme is peaceful, but many in the international community fear it is aimed at developing nuclear weapons, not least since Tehran is producing far more fissile material than its civilian nuclear facilities need at present.
Israel, itself widely thought to have nuclear weapons and which has refused to rule out military action, has sharply criticised the Geneva deal. Many Gulf monarchies are also unsettled by it.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
