Xi 's failed promises dim hopes for change in 2nd term

Xi's defenders argue that he had to consolidate his authority before he could take tough decisions

Xi Jinping
Chinese President Xi Jinping attends the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland (Photo: Reuters)
Chris Buckley & Keith Bradsher | NYT Beijing
Last Updated : Mar 06 2017 | 12:19 AM IST
For years, China’s president, Xi Jinping, has talked the talk of economic reform. In January, he dazzled business executives in Davos, Switzerland, with a defense of international trade. Last month, he urged officials to “seize hold of reform and make it an even bigger priority”. And the annual meeting of China’s legislature, starting Sunday, appears sure to echo that theme.

But as Xi nears the end of his first five-year term as Communist Party leader, his record has not lived up to the bold statements, critics say.

The question now is whether he was ever really serious about taking the painful steps needed to repair the economy, or merely paying lip service to reform to justify his tightening grip on power. Xi’s defenders argue that he had to consolidate his authority first, before he could make the potentially wrenching decisions needed to open markets and trim bloated state-owned industries. With weak growth in the rest of the world and demand for China’s exports flagging, they contend, there was little margin for error and caution was warranted. The proof will be in the second term, they say, when Xi finally has the power to push through difficult economic adjustments. 

Xi is already China’s most powerful leader in decades. He has repeatedly used his authority, though, to undercut reforms he says are necessary, ordering heavy-handed intervention in the stock market, for example, and restrictions on the movement of money abroad and property prices.

The problem, critics say, is that Xi’s demands for centralized control, stability and political conformity have often drowned out hesitant steps toward economic liberalisation. And his second term is likely to bring more of the same, they say. “I’m highly sceptical, since I don’t think it’s a lack of authority or the opposition of special interests that have kept him from moving in that direction so far,” said Scott Kennedy, the director of the Project on Chinese Business and Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
©2017 The New York Times News Service

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story