Throw your brand ambassador out

Image
Ruchita Saxena Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 05 2013 | 3:55 AM IST
In a country that breathes in Bollywood and breathes out cricket, the quickest way to script a successful brand campaign is believed to be an actor's or a cricketer's signature. However, a new survey suggests that celebrity-endorsed campaigns do not influence purchase decisions.

The survey, done by market research firm IMRB International in association with IPAN, has thrown up two other eye-opening inferences. One, that celebrity advertising has proliferated so much that consumers have begun to associate celebrities with brands they do not endorse. The second is that good advertising can create celebrities out of non-entities.

More than half the respondents in the survey do not think celebrities use the products they endorse. Many believe that celebrities would endorse many things just for money, but themselves use only the high-end or imported products.

About 78 per cent of the people surveyed think quality is the most important factor in buying a product, 9 per cent are led by the price and a meagre 3 per cent consider celebrity as the most important factor.

The survey covered 2,109 people across age groups, social class and gender in the metros, mid-sized cities and small ones. That is not good news for many.

A research report by Adex India, brought out by TAM, says there has been 49 per cent growth in celebrity advertising volume in 2007. Since 2003, celebrity endorsement volume on television has increased by more than six times.

Expectedly, the advertising money spent on celebrities has gone up, too. In 2001, only 25 per cent of advertising money went into well-known pockets. This has grown to almost 60 per cent, according to Percept Talent Management, which handles many celebrity accounts.

On an average, companies are spending 0.7 per cent of their annual brand sales volume on celebrity endorsements and a whopping 35 per cent on media buying.

As a case in point, Cadbury India, when it was reeling under the worms controversy, roped in Amitabh Bachchan to endorse its claim of quality. That is believed to have helped.

However, Bachchan's endorsing Dabur's Chyawanprash, for instance, seems to have an impact that does not match up to his impact on Cadbury's fortunes.

In fact, Bachchan is endorsing so many products that consumers have begun to make incorrect brand associations.

Click here for detailed story

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 22 2008 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story