Shares ot telecom companies, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone-Idea, came under heavy pressure in the afternoon trade on Thursday after the Supreme Court (SC) rejected telcos' definition of adjusted gross revenue (AGR). The apex court, on the other hand, upheld the Department of Telecommunications (DoT)'s view that other than termination fee and roaming charges, all revenue accruing to telcos are to be included in AGR.
In its verdict, the apex court has prescribed the new definition of AGR and held that all revenue accruing from telcos constitute to AGR.
Reacting to the verdict, the stocks of incumbent telcos plunged. Shares of Bharti Airtel slipped as much as 10.19 per cent to Rs 327 apiece on the NSE, while those of Vodafone-Idea nosedived over 23 per cent. They, however, recovered after the knee-jerk reaction. At close, shares of Bharti Airtel stood at Rs 372 on the BSE, up over 3 per cent. Vodafone Idea ended at Rs 4.33, down over 23 per cent.
READ MORE While the industry has already paid 85 per cent of the demand raised by the DoT, the remaining 15 per cent has remained in dispute for a very long time with the telcos getting favorable judgments in various legal forums, including Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), High Courts and even the Supreme Court.
The fourteen year old case had the mobile operators locked in a legal battle with the government over the definition of AGR. It is the basis on which the Department of Telecom calculates levies payable by operators. Telecom companies pay around 3-5 per cent and 8 per cent of the AGR as spectrum usage charges and licence fees, respectively, to DoT.
After the judgment, a statement released by Bharti Airtel said, "We are disappointed by the verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The definition of AGR has been a long standing dispute between the DoT and the Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) dating to 2005. The issue of inclusion of revenue from non-telecom activities and interpretation of the heads included in the definition of AGR under the license conditions has been through several rounds of litigation, which have been in favour of the TSPs till now."