Are Coal India's bankers making more money than its investors?

If things remain as they are, at some point in time, the market will start putting more value for the cash CIL holds in its books rather than its business of coal mining

Jitendra Kumar Gupta Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 20 2014 | 12:26 PM IST
It seems neither Coal India (CIL) nor its shareholders know what to do with the huge cash pile of Rs 62,000 crore the company is sitting on. A back-of-the-envelope calculation of extrapolating the cash flows in the previous financial years, this kitty is likely to swell to Rs 82,000 crore in FY15, or nearly 44% of its current market capitalisation (m-cap).

If things remain as they are, at some point in time, the market will start putting more value for the cash CIL holds in its books rather than its business of coal mining!

One argument suggest that the company should deploy the funds more productively by investing in assets that would yield high returns or return it to the investors through the buyback / special dividend route. Simply keeping money in a bank deposit would not yield a high return for CIL since the average yield on such bank deposits may not be more than 8–9%.

On the other hand, those investors who do not wish to tender the shares in a buyback could still play the stock for dividend.

Capex vs Buyback

Another sensible step for the company could be to start deploying cash in the business through capex that will not only help in growth but will also help boost valuations once earnings improve. Even from the shareholders perspective, if the company deploys money in the business, every rupee of earnings will add 12 times (based on price to earnings ratio of 12) to its m-cap.

In this case, investors will make more money if the cash is deployed in the business as stock price could increase on account of an overall improvement in the return / financial ratios.

Another way the company can utilise the cash is to go in for a buyback. At current market price, the company is making almost 10% earnings yield, which is better than the bank rate. However, a buyback may not be a feasible option considering that it will lead to the liquidity issues and price manipulation in the event of a low float.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 20 2014 | 12:23 PM IST

Next Story