Co-location case: Sebi needs to prove basis for disgorgement, NSE tells SAT

The counsel argued that the exchange should have also been given chance to explain its position on the disgorgement order

NSE
FILE PHOTO: Logo of National Stock Exchange (NSE) displayed outside the headquarter, in Mumbai | Photo: PTI
Jash Kriplani Mumbai
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 12 2019 | 1:07 AM IST
The National Stock Exchange (NSE) on Wednesday told the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) must explain the basis of the disgorgement order it passed against the exchange in the co-location case.

Somasekhar Sudaresan, representing the NSE, said the order had observed that there was no case of fraud or collusion of employees with trading members in the co-location case. Therefore, a disgorgement order was not tenable, he added. 

Sudaresan also said the NSE had been exonerated under the Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices norms.

In the securities market, a person or entity making profit by fraudulent means is slapped with a disgorgement order to repay those gains to affected investors, with interest.

Sudaresan argued that the NSE should have also been given a chance to explain its position. So far, the NSE has transferred Rs 2,300 crore to an escrow account to transfer revenues from the co-location business till the probe was completed, according to Sebi’s order. 

The SAT on Wednesday also heard a plea by former NSE managing director Ravi Narain against Sebi’s order barring him from associating with any listed entity for five years for his alleged role in the co-location case.  

The counsel representing Narain argued that the reply of another chief technology officer, which was not included in the order, showed that the principle of disseminating the data in a fair manner was always made known by the senior management of the NSE to the employees. 

Further, the breaches were said to be made against Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corporations regulations, which came into effect only in 2012. 

The Tick by tick (TBT) system was opted under Narain in 2010. The counsel added that when weighing between TBT and others, the former was chosen as it would put lower cost burden on brokers to set up the infrastructure. This way, more brokers could opt for the facility. 

The SAT will, on Thursday, hear the plea by Chitra Ramakrishna, who resigned as MD and CEO of the NSE in December 2016.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :NSENational Stock ExchangeSebiSecurities Appellate TribunalNSE co-location facilityNSE co location case

Next Story