The fear of a commodity transaction tax (CTT) is haunting derivative traders once again, prompting the consumer affairs ministry to take up their cause.
Minister of Consumer Affairs, K V Thomas, has written to Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, saying such a move would distort the nascent market. Meanwhile, the buzz is growing louder about the finance ministry's move to introduce CTT on non-agri commodities in the Budget to garner additional funds from the rapidly growing futures market. Non-agri commodities account for over 80 per cent of the entire trade on the commodity exchanges.
A CTT of 0.017 per cent, or Rs 17 for every lakh of transactions, on commodity derivatives was announced in the 2008-09 Budget. However, it was never put to practice, as there were apprehensions from then Minister of Consumer Affairs Sharad Pawar and the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council (PMEAC).
Commodities players are opposed to any such move, as they fear it would divert hedgers and speculators towards rampant 'dabba trading' (illegal trading). The tax would also impact the volume and liquidity of commodity exchanges.
Commodity futures are considered useful for hedgers and, without them, real market depth won’t come. Increasing the transaction tax will create a road block for their entry.
The minister’s letter had specified that such a tax would hamper the growth of the organised commodity futures market in India, said sources.
Referring to the views of Pawar and PMEAC chairman, C Rangarajan, who had opposed CTT when it was announced in the 2008 Budget, Thomas said, “In an era of reforms, the introduction of CTT will act as a deterrent and distort the market, having an adverse impact on not only the stakeholders, but also the economy.”
An increase in CTT is contrary to an observation in the Economic Survey, 2007-08, “Direct participation of the farmers in the commodity futures markets is somewhat difficult at this stage, as the large lot size, daily margining, high membership fees, etc work as deterrent for farmers’ participation in these markets” and the increase in CTT will further increase the cost.
Though the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Act has a provision that says no tax, cess or mandi fee is payable by the farmers, they will have to pay CTT as it is proposed to be levied on sellers. It implies that a farmer, who sells a futures contract to protect himself against price risk, will be required to pay CTT.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
