The capital markets regulator has called for more scrutiny, based on detailed research, amid a rise in the banking system's stressed assets. The move is a fallout of the problems faced by JPMorgan MF on account of its investment in Amtek Auto’s debt, later downgraded by rating agencies.
ALSO READ: JPMorgan to separate illiquid Amtek paper from its 2 schemes
Also Read
| DON’T LEAN ON OTHERS, PLEASE |
|
Sebi has specifically asked fund houses to reduce concentration risk in their fixed income portfolios, said people in the know. By the norms, a fixed income scheme can invest up to 15 per cent in a single non-convertible debenture, up to 20 per cent with approval of the fund house’s trustees. A debt scheme can have exposure of up to 30 per cent to one sector.
Among measures mulled by Sebi are changes to the disclosure and pricing norms for debt schemes.
Sources said Sebi is also worried about MFs' exposure to Jindal Steel & Power’s debt, recently downgraded by rating agency ICRA.
“We will hold consultations with market participants and the Mutual Fund Advisory Committee to determine whether there is a need to revisit the rules,” said a source.
JPMorgan had decided to restrict redemptions in two of its schemes, due to exposure to the illiquid Amtek Auto paper. The regulator wants no repeat of this situation, which could spread panic among investors. Amtek Auto’s paper, in which two debt schemes of JPMorgan have invested, was downgraded by one rating agency, while another suspended coverage.
In September 2012, Sebi had asked fund houses to cut their exposure to a single sector to 30 per cent. “AMCs shall ensure that total exposure of debt schemes of MFs in a particular sector (excluding investments in bank CDs, CBLO, G-Secs, T-Bills and AAA-rated securities issued by public financial institutions and public sector banks) shall not exceed 30 per cent of the net assets of the scheme,” stated their circular.
Currently, the domestic MF sector has debt assets worth nearly Rs 9 lakh crore, a third of which is into corporate debt. Although primary issuances in the corporate debt market are high, there is little liquidity in the secondary market, a complication in terms of pricing and trading of these bonds.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app