Don't be lured by PFC, REC valuations

Investors should gauge if they meet the promise on loan upgrades before taking new positions

loan
Hamsini Karthik
Last Updated : Nov 18 2017 | 1:42 AM IST
At a time when the Street was giving up hopes on India’s exclusive power financiers Power Finance Corporation (PFC) and Rural Electrification Corporation (REC), the bailout plan for distressed state electricity boards (SEBs) and some traction from renewable power projects lent a helping hand to both. This is also reflecting in their September quarter (Q2) numbers. Yet, these are only temporary rescue measures.

The long-term pipeline for both does not look as strong as a few years ago, thanks to the slump in the sector. In the near term, protecting asset quality and reducing loan losses is crucial. To do so, it is important both witness upgrade or improvement in their stressed loan portfolios. Upgradation of an account would eliminate the need to provide for it and enable the financiers to recognise interest income as well.

Positively, PFC after its Q2 results has forecast Rs 8,300 crore of upgrades, most of which is likely to flow in the December quarter. For REC, the forecast is Rs 9,000 crore, which it expects would come from SEBs in the coming quarters. Thanks to upgrades worth Rs 11,000 crore, PFC was able to maintain a year-ago level of net profit, despite net interest income (NII) slipping five per cent.



For REC, its NII fell 16.6 per cent over a year (down 8.4 per cent sequentially), leading to a 17 per cent decline over a year in operating profit. As loan a private power generator had to be restructured, provisioning costs more than doubled, thereby resulting in a 30 per cent decline over a year in net profit to Rs 1,215 crore. The good thing is asset quality was kept under reasonable check.

Bettering expectations, PFC and REC posted seven per cent and 10 per cent increase, respectively, in their loan book, helped by demand from the power transmission and generation segment. They also maintained net interest margin at over four per cent, lower than the peak five per cent, still favourable compared to that of corporate-facing banks.

Therefore, when the loan book is improving, containing slippage and loan losses on a sustained basis are needed. Until PFC and REC do so, their benign valuations (1x FY18 price-to-book) alone don’t make them an attractive proposition. In fact, public sector banks and their private peers such as ICICI Bank, far more diversified, are now available at these valuations.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story