The commodity derivatives market regulator suspended futures trading in guar in July last year, suspecting price manipulation. Involved in the artificial rigging were, it appears, a number of renowned traders; investigations are still on.
“You (exchanges) are directed to forward the copy of bank account statements of the top 25 clients to track the source of funds used in trading guar seed/gum. Also, exchange may conduct a preliminary enquiry and submit the report within 15 days on the price movement of guar gum and seed futures contracts and observations of the surveillance team of the exchange on the price movement/suspect traders,” says the FMC directive. It adds, “If the member has business on his own account, his profile indicating the names of partners/directors shall be forwarded.”
The details should also incorporate which side clients have taken a position since the start of relaunched contracts, alongwith overall long and short size positions held.
After the relaunch of guar gum and guar seed contracts, high price volatility has been observed. While approving the contracts of guar gum and seed, the exchanges were directed to ensure no unhealthy speculative trading. To avoid a repeat of last year’s price manipulation, the FMC had directed exchanges to call for a statement of physical stocks owned by clients who hold 75 per cent or more of the permitted position limit whenever deemed necessary.
Yet, guar gum and seed trading hit the circuit limit on either side almost every other day on the benchmark National Commodity & Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX). Since the fundamentals are unchanged, FMC believes this is due to excessive speculation in the futures market.
Since the relaunch of guar contracts on the NCDEX on June 20, after around a year of suspension, the gum price has ranged between Rs 11,510 a qtl and Rs 28,150 a qtl every month. Guar seed has moved between Rs 9,500 a qtl and Rs 4,000 a qtl.
Unlike last year, the FMC has asked exchanges for a preliminary investigation report.
Priti Gupta, executive director at Anand Rathi, the financial advisory, said: “The regulator, with all such details in hand (as has been now asked for) will be able to preempt any untoward incidents. Instead of suspending futures trading, it is better to avoid cartelising for better use of the futures trading platform for genuine hedgers.”
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)