Investor association moves House panel on algorithm trades

Seeks intervention on weak Sebi processes, regulation of controversial trading segment

Investor association moves House panel on Sebi irregularities
The logo of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), India's market regulator, is seen on the facade of its head office building in Mumbai
N Sundaresha Subramanian New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 01 2015 | 11:51 PM IST
A Delhi-based Investor Association has submitted a representation to the Veerappa Moily-headed Parliamentary committee on finance on alleged irregularities in the processes followed by Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) in introducing algorithmic trading in Indian markets.

Midas Touch Investor Association has sought the panel’s intervention in reviewing the regulation in the new market segment, which according to market estimates, accounts for about a fifth of total volumes on the exchanges.

Key issues raised by Midas include lack of transparent processes in introduction of algo-trading, inadequate safeguards to ensure level playing field for small investors and perils of delegating regulatory oversight of such trades to exchanges.

“I have personally handed over the representation to the chairman. He has promised to look into it,” Virendra Jain, president, Midas Touch told Business Standard.

ISSUES RAISED BY MIDAS TOUCH
  • Lack of transparency in formation of the algo trading framework in 2012
  • Inadequate guidelines on physical infrastructure of colocation services
  • Inadequate safeguards to ensure level playing field
  • Delegation of regulatory function to bourses against letter and spirit of law
  • Processes not as robust as followed by SEC

It has alleged that unlike its American counterpart, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), which had sought public comments before introducing the co-location framework, Sebi did it without consultations.

The submissions assume significance as the panel had earlier directed Sebi to look into a whistleblower letter alleging manipulation in the algo framework.

In a statement, Midas Touch Investors Association said it has “made a representation to Shri Veerappa Moilly, chairman of Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, on regulation of algorithmic trading guidelines by Sebi, whistleblower and the current National Stock Exchange controversy relating to it. The representation states that this matter is important enough to be taken up by the committee and necessary directions be given subsequently.”

An e-mail, seeking comments on the submissions, sent to a Sebi spokesperson on Tuesday did not elicit any response. Following the whistleblower report, a financial stability report by the Reserve Bank of India in June had cautioned that these high speed trades can pose risks in the form of erroneous trades and manipulation. In July, Sebi Chairman UK Sinha had said the regulator was looking at options to bring down risks in the segment.

The association has told the house committee in its representation that Sebi adopted a “non-transparent process” and did not invite stakeholders comments while framing a draft of guidelines, and subsequently in “the issue of Initial guidelines for Algorithmic Trading and co-location and its supporting infrastructure in 2012.”

Further, it said the initial guidelines did not contain any instructions “about the co-location and other hardware and physical infrastructure required to ensure a level playing field among all participants in the securities market”. It is completely silent about co-location, Midas said.

According to the association, which had taken up several investor issues, including the Satyam Computer scandal in the past, the initial guidelines are in violation of the Sebi Act and Securities Contracts Regulation Act, in letter and spirit. The initial guidelines, Midas argued, impliedly empowered stock exchanges to license and regulate Algorithmic Trading and co-location as they deem fit with hardly any Sebi oversight. “Under the securities laws, Sebi is the regulator entrusted with regulating stock exchanges and securities market , among others. These functions cannot be delegated,” the representation said.

The representation stated that even in the US, specific approval of the SEC was required to be obtained by the stock exchange for detailed terms of co-location and related services.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 01 2015 | 10:39 PM IST

Next Story