Slowing redemptions and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)'s special window for banks to meet the cash requirements of MFs, which opened on Thursday, helped ease the pain. However, the absence of fresh inflows is keeping the industry on the edge.
MFs faced one of their highest single-day outflows on Tuesday since October 2008, when Lehman Brothers shut down, triggering a global financial crisis, after RBI's move on Monday to make it more expensive for participants to borrow short-term money triggered panic in the bond markets. While aimed at easing the pressure on the rupee, the market interpreted it as a move to tighten short-term rates.
Yields rose and dragged down prices (bond yields and prices move in opposite directions), squeezing net asset values of all debt schemes including liquid, gilt and short-term bonds.
Investors, mostly banks and companies, pulled money out of liquid schemes, in which they park idle funds. Liquid schemes invest in money market instruments, short-term corporate deposits and bonds with maturity of three to six months. By unofficial estimates, institutions might have redeemed Rs 70,000-75,000 crore from money market schemes in the past two days, with the bulk on Tuesday. Investments by these investors account for almost 75 per cent of the total assets under management of liquid schemes.
Outflows from debt schemes reduced to a trickle on Thursday compared to the earlier two days, said MF officials. This is partly because banks and companies hardly pulled out any money on Thursday, while high net worth individuals have largely stayed put to avoid redeeming at losses, said officials. "There was a knee-jerk reaction. But once the severity of the measures subsided, the markets calmed, which is why we saw lower redemptions," said Killol Pandya, senior fund manager, debt, at LIC Nomura MF.
Officials said smaller funds were squeezed more than their larger counterparts due to redemptions. This is because debt assets of smaller funds are mostly driven by large investors such as banks, which pulled out most of their money.
However, unlike October 2008, many funds managed to stay afloat after the crisis because of Amfi's directive on Tuesday to mark all their portfolios to market values (meaning revaluation at current prices of all assets), said officials. This forced them to pass on the losses to investors, unlike in 2008, when MFs took it on their books.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)