The report has yet not been made public by the exchange. When contacted, MCX did not want to comment on the issue.
PWC submitted the final report a week ago.
Also, according to the report, technical support services as well as management services, which were outsourced to the parent company FTIL, were unfavourable to the commodity exchange, the sources said.
One of the major findings of the report was a technology supply contract by anchor investors involving a payout of about Rs 1,000 crore by the exchange through the life span of the contract. The contract, said the report, was one-sided and favoured FTIL, MCX’s promoter and technology and software supplier.
| Highlights of the report |
| Over Rs 100 crore paid without verifying genuineness of receiving part |
| Outsourced technology supply contract favours FTIL |
| MCX filing complaint against employees named in report with ED, EOW and CBO |
| FMC asks exchange to submit action taken report by Monday |
PWC report raised questions on some contracts above Rs.25 lakh entered into by MCX.
Meanwhile FTIL, which holds 26 per cent stake in MCX, said it had neither received the PWC report nor has PWC consulted or sought clarification on its the report.
An FTIL statement said MCX violated the principle of natural justice by not sharing the report and by not allowing FTIL to provide its clarification on the PWC findings. “This report is intentionally leaked at the time when FTIL is in the process of divestment of equity shares of MCX. FTIL sees such selective leakages as malicious, highly defamatory and motivated with vested interests,” the statement said.
FTIL said no transaction with MCX violated any legal provisions of corporate law or taxation and it would vehemently pursue legal action against MCX and PwC for painting wrong picture in its audit report. In fact all the necessary disclosures were made by MCX in its prospectus including all the related party contracts entered into between the parties at the time of MCX public issue.
FTIL said MCX’s financial and operations has been audited by statutory auditor of international repute like Deloitte Haskins Touché and KPMG associates for the last 10 years besides being regularly audited by the FMC.
All transactions carried out between MCX and FTIL are based on commercial agreements with FTIL creating long term infrastructure platform in terms of technology back-bone and support for the exchange. The question of transfer pricing is not at all applicable. FTIL has paid all the necessary taxes for the services performed & revenue earned by the company.
Sources familiar with the developments said the exchange’s board of directors is likely to file a complaint with the Enforcement Directorate, the Economic Offences Wing of the Police as well as the Central Bureau of Investigation against the employees mentioned in the PWC audit report. One of the senior employee in charge of business development is understood to have resigned after the report was submitted.
The audit report initiated on instructions from the commodities market regulator Forward Markets Commission In the wake of Rs 5,600-crore payment crisis at the National Spot Exchange also said that several transactions between the anchor investor of the exchange, Financial Technologies (FTIL), and MCX were made in violation of transfer pricing norms.
MCX, a leading derivative exchange, is in a spot after the PWC report as the exchange is a listed entity and it is supposed to disclose price sensitive information to the exchange. MCX is now under pressure from the Bombay Stock Exchange on which it is listed to disclose those information.
In an announcement to the BSE earlier, MCX had earlier said that it will initiate appropriate actions after obtaining prior approval of the auditor. Even the FMC has directed the exchange to submit to it by May 5 what actions it has taken on the PWC report.
The significant of the disclosing the contents of the report is even more as FMC had asked the exchange to ensure that its anchor investor FTIL reduces its stake in MCX from 26 per cent to 2 per cent by April 30 as per its order declaring it not fit to run the exchange passed in December last. While FTIL has received bids for stake sale, bidders were waiting to know content of PWC report before submitting binding bids.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)